Shannon Watts, Michael Bloomberg and all the rest of the far leftist gun control industry would have us all disarmed and passive in the face of violent attack. Because, of course, we can all work things out by talking about it.
Except when we can’t.
Here’s a video of a pajama boy and his girlfriend being accosted by four Muslim toughs. He’s a lover, not a fighter. He might need to find himself a new girlfriend after seeing what happens in this video, as not only does he not engage the attackers, but he also abandons his girlfriend to the predators who have no qualms about hitting women.
If he was a real man, this video would have had a very different ending.
If he was a prudent man, who carried with him the means with which he could defend himself, his loved ones and other innocent life from violent criminal predatory attack, this video would have had a very different ending.
And for the untrained, here’s a hint: While the aggressors were “unarmed”, there was a disparity of force in terms of numbers. Even unarmed, a group attacking a single person means death or great bodily injury is likely to occur and deadly force in response is justified. Furthermore, all members of the attacking group share responsibility, so they all can eat some lead or face an edged weapon so long as they persist in continuing the attack.
But the individual in this video was not a real man, nor a prudent man.
He was a passive sissy-boy, with any aggressiveness trained out of him by pacifists in the liberal public education system.
Viewer Discretion Advised.
h/t to Miguel at Gun Free Zone. Miguel’s take: “If you look like food, you will be eaten.”
Comments are closed.