What is it with the gun control activists of late?

We all know gun control fanatics are control freaks, but publicly calling for the government to snuff out those with whom they disagree is deeply troubling and should be roundly castigated and scorned.

But it’s not.

Instead, it’s published and written about in the mainstream media as though killing law-abiding Americans exercising their Constitutionally-protected rights is somehow reasonable and rational discourse.

What’s next with these gun-hating fanatics?  Shall we send the government to snuff out Jews because “they” own a lot of banks and businesses, depriving the poor of everything they want and causing them to suffer because of that?

Two things came to mind.  First, none of these gun control zealots offered to take up arms themselves to kill their fellow Americans.  “Send someone else to do it” seems to be their courageous solution.  Secondly, they oppose gun ownership, but seems to be advocating the use of guns on their behalf.

In other words, they are hypocritical cowards.

First it was a left-wing talk radio host that frankly I wasn’t aware still was even employed after the Air America network fiasco crashed and burned after mere months on the air.

Gun control zealot Mike Malloy touted a plan on-air to cause law enforcement to kill law-abiding gun owners. ” If you can’t convince them, kill them” seems to be his solution to debate.

Michael Malloy aired his plan to get open-carry activists killed by police in a recent radio show and has been wallowing in the adulation and admiration of like-minded gun control activists ever since.

“I guess what I’ll do if I’m ever in that situation and I see one of these half-witted yahoos walking in with a weapon, high-caliber rifle like that, I’ll just put on a berserk act.I will just start screaming Gun! Gun! Gun! Watch out, everybody hit the deck! Guns! Guns! Everybody! And then dial 911 and I will say, shots fired, which will bring every g**-damned cop within 15 miles. And then the half-wits with the long guns are going to panic and they’re going to run out of the store and if that rifle isn’t shouldered properly, the cop is going to take a look at that and put a bullet right in their forehead.”

This sounds a lot like “SWATTING” there, Michael, where someone will crank call 9-1-1 and cause an emergency call out of law-enforcement for some heinous crime in progress.

Even gun-hating nut Michael Malloy’s plan doesn’t go far enough for Susie Madrik and Rick Perlstein.

Susie’s writing at “Crooks and Liars” and Perlstein is at “Salon“.  Both are advocating and end to the gun debate and instead letting “the government” crush those evil gun rights activists.

Here’s what Susie wrote:  “So what line has to be crossed in the good old U.S. of A. before we start mowing them down to make our point?”  She continues:  “Do we have the ATF and BLM agents roll up in armored tanks? Do we use drone strikes?”

Perlstein is a little more subtle.  “…There is virtually no countervailing power to the now-hegemonic acceptance that there’s nothing much to do about the proliferation of guns in America.”

We all know gun control fanatics are zealots and control freaks.  Why is it they are so prone to advocating violence to win the debate?







4 thoughts on “GUN HATER INTOLERANCE: Screeds seek government violence against gun owners”
  1. And they suggest actual violence to deter hypothetical violence with no statistically significant precedent in reality for 100 years of the modern firearm. When navel gazing turns destructive.

  2. Is this Mike Malloy trying to be relevant or is he genuinely this much of a flaming asshole?

    Or both?

    You think he’s got a gun at home?


  3. Doing what he said, calling 911 and screaming, “Shots Fired” is akin to screaming “Fire” in a theatre when there is no fire. This person needs to be subdued.

Comments are closed.