Democrats have listened to their intuition.  They have good reason to believe that the elections next year won’t go well for their party.  With that in mind, they have moved to strike while they have their best chances of passing radical gun control upon the American people before next year’s elections.  In short, they are seeking to ban all semi-automatic firearms and all magazines that hold over 10 rounds.

The scope of the bill is truly unprecedented and like nothing we’ve ever seen before.

What’s more is that Democrats introduced this bill when the US Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment is not a second-class right any longer in the Bruen decision last summer.

With Democrats narrowly controlling the US Senate and only two votes from control of the House, this bill is not dead on arrival as it should be.

The good news is if this thing goes to on-the-record votes, it will cost Democrats some seats in the House and maybe a Senate seat or two.  The bad news is that it will come perilously close to passage.

From ZeroHedge:

The latest push to curb Second Amendment rights comes in the form of a Democrat-led bill that seeks to impose a sweeping firearms ban with exceptions that gun rights groups say are so fuzzy that the prohibition could prohibit nearly all semi-automatic handguns.

The bill, dubbed the Gas-Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act (GOSAFE) that a gun rights group panned as “perhaps the most sweeping gun prohibition bill of the 21st Century,” was introduced on Nov. 29 by a number of Democrat senators, along with an Independent—with no Republicans joining.

Generally, the key idea of the bill is to ban firearms that can be fired quickly (along with accessories that increase firing speed) and have the ability to accept magazines with a capacity of 10 rounds or more, all in a bid to limit “a firearm’s ability to inflict maximum harm in a short amount of time.”

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), the bill’s co-sponsor, said in a statement that the measure seeks to keep “those firearms that are inherently dangerous and unusually lethal, designed for maximum harm, out of the hands of those who pose a threat to themselves or others.”

9 thoughts on “BRUEN BE DAMNED: Radical Democrats introduce national semi-auto gun ban to strip law-abiding residents of most effective self-defense firearms on the market”
  1. WOW, The Marxist-democRATS, being the anti-Constitutional lying scum they are allow the criminal element of society to run rampant while trying to disarm anyone who wants to arm themselves for personal protection! IF they are successful with this atrocity, law enforcement, even their own “protection staff” would be without the best defense tools available for fighting crime and terrorism! ANY AND ALL politicians should never have “protection staff” paid for by the very citizens they are writing legislation to disarm! WHO IS THE IN-DEPEND ant SCUM BASS-TURD ALIGNED WITH THE MARXIST SCUM? Let me guess, Toad’s hero: in-depend-ant Bernie Sanders?

    There is your “representation” Toady-boy, Bert, ken, and all the rest of you “diaper crowd”, the in-depend-ants posting on this web site!!!!

    1. To parrot Will Smith : keep my name out of your fever Swamp dripping brain addled ranting nonsense screeds boy!

      Your memory is obviously as short as your p*****. I am a Reagan conservative.
      My family founded this nation. The mere thought of being a so-called independent. Much less being accused of being independent by a d*******Little swine like yourself is insulting to the core.

      Again, my family has fought in every war this nation ever brought, Good bad or in between.

      You sit here and rant your little nutjob rants on this website. But tell us what are you personally doing to fight the gun grabbers? How many lawsuits do you have that you are personally prosecuting? I’m working on one right now.
      How much money have you spent on the fight against the gun Grabbers? I’ve spent thousands of dollars so far and I’m nowhere near over…

      I would appreciate it if you leave my name out of your characterizing any person on this site as a liberal or even an independent. oH, and, spell it right next time!

    2. wow, kenny-boy, tripped yer trigger, didn’t I? too bad, sooo sad, you are the one who started this feud many moons ago, don’t you remember why you were banned? you pathetic vile pile of excrement. I will spell in-depend ant any way I choose to, kenny-boy be damned. just because you post anonymously behind a keyboard on this site does not mean what your post is truthful, kenny-boy, and all the bernie sanders (B S) you have posted in the past makes me NOT believe ANYTHING you post! so, go hide under yer bed, under a rock, or in yer mommie’s basement and suck yer thumb or anything you normally suck. K M A, kenny-boy! my guess is you don’t understand the “double an Tandre” with my spelling of “in-depend-ant”, for those who claim to be “independent” and appear to be “proud” of being so when their vote is wasted, is enabling democRAT-i-KKK agenda, etc. etc., etc.

  2. Pro 2A congressional members should add amendments to the bill that require all federal law enforcement / security agencies, excluding Marshals, Border Patrol, and Coast Guard (maybe include Bureau of Prisons, too) shall be disarmed as well. That’ll fetch a lot of no votes.

    1. Yeah, don’t bet on it Kevin, after all if semi-auto firearms are available they can be stolen by the criminal element of society. How will the Marxist-democRATS eliminate all semi-auto firearms after “banning” them? Won’t happen, can’t happen, imagine how many are owned in America, manufactured since early in the 20th century, 110 years plus, multiple manufacturers.
      DemocRATS and the in-depend ant B. S. (Bernie Slanders, Toad’s favorite politician, hero) ALL stick together like slimy excrement in their depends.

  3. Damn, now I’m going to have to take my home off the market, no advantage to moving out of state now if this Communist bill passes. The states and federal governments are flooding the skies with so many of these ridiculous bills it’s getting hard to see any daylight in our future. Fighting them in the courts is draining the savings of the taxpayers, Taxpayers dollars are paying the government lawyers, and taxpayers dollars are paying law abiding gun owners lawyers to fight to keep and protect our rights. Taxpayers are taking it on the chin.

  4. all political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party – Mao Zedong

  5. Ho-Hum time for the revolution to come. What more can be said? These people don’t care, anything to disarm American citizens.

  6. Key questions are how will they get this passed, who will be enforcing it, who believes it will survive the challenges immediately filed by the manufacturers for loss of revenue.
    The constitution requires no “Ex post facto” laws, so the firearms in circulation remain out there. How do you prove you owned it prior to the ban, without a comprehensive registration system. If I understand it correctly the NICS only stores your approval, and rifle, pistol, shotgun or firearm. No model, or make is on database. Your purchase could be a break action 12 gauge, or an evil riot gun. It could be a “Sniper starter kit” bolt action, or an evil destructomatic fully semiauto, with the thing that goes up in the back.
    I do not place a lot of faith in the clown show inside the beltway, the vast majority are damaged goods, and badly compromised, by residing in what used to be a malarial swamp, and in some ways still is.

Comments are closed.