Fortune Brainstorm Green 2014 May 19, 2014: Laguna Niguel 5:20 PM - ONE ON ONE: THE LEVI’S MANTRA Panelist:
Chip Bergh, President and CEO, Levi Strauss Moderator:
Andy Serwer, Fortune Photograph by Stuart Isett/Fortune Brainstorm Green 2014

Levi's wants to make less money. No really. Levi Strauss CEO Chip Bergh posted an open letter in Fortune Magazine saying his company doesn't want your guns (and, by extension, your money) in their stores. What's more, Mr. Bergh's utterly unconcerned about a boycott as "most boycott threats around this topic ultimately blow over." Mr. Bergh apparently thinks gun owners are stupid, with short memories and no doubt other stubby attributes.

Mr. Bergh must think himself exceptionally intelligent, diving head-first into a very shallow pond of liberal politics following the recent election. Most smart folks would think it wise for an iconic American brand to avoid divisive politics, but not Mr. Bergh. He told Fortune, "You don’t need a gun to try on a pair of jeans."

The prudent man isn't worried about needing a gun to try on a pair of jeans. The prudent man or woman is concerned about the parking lot outside the business as parking lots are a favorite place of bad guys to accost unsuspecting shoppers. The prudent man knows that you never know where a bad guy will choose to prey on an innocent – maybe even a Levi's store. We all know that signs and policies against good guys having guns act as a dinner bell for wackos, terrorists and thugs.

The denim company's head honcho went on to further demonstrate just how out-of-touch his beliefs remain by tying the gun prohibition to high profile terror attacks.

“With stores in Paris, Nice and Orlando, and the company’s European headquarters in Brussels, I’ve thought more about safety in the past year than in the previous three decades of my career because of how ‘close to home’ so many incidents with guns have come to impacting people working for this company."

Clearly strict Euro-style gun control worked so well to save lives across the pond, right Mr. Bergh?

paris-terror-attack1-jpg1

 

brussels-terror-attack

That would be the aftermath of the Paris attacks on top, and then murder scene in Brussels below it. As for Florida's blanket prohibition on licensed good guys carrying in establishments that serve liquor – even if they remain sober – it saved dozens at The Pulse nightclub, right Chip?

orlando-terrorist-attack

It's more than a little alarming how Mr. Bergh conflates radical Islamic terror attacks with "gun" violence. Only a fool would think that asking customers to leave their personal defense weapons outside of his stores would render them — and the employees in a store — safer. Denial has no survival value, not even in Levi's San Francisco home.

I only wish I still had a pair of Levi's to burn. I quit wearing them nearly ten years ago and haven't looked back. 5.11 makes more comfortable pants that allow me to carry my stuff. 5.11 and plenty of other companies welcome my gun along with my money. And they'll surely do the same for any other soon-to-be former Levi's customers.

10 thoughts on “Levi’s Hates Gun Owners and Thinks They Have a Short Memory”
  1. Actually, I *DO* need a gun when I try on pants.  I won't try them on w/o my IWB item in place, to ensure proper fit/comfort, as well as any material/design issues that lead to more of a printing concern (e.g. lighter fabrics or tighter cuts that allow the material to hug the holster, showing more of the outline.

    Same w/ shirts – a "print check" is mandatory while trying things on.

  2. This clown mentioned a gun in the Nice terrorist attack. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the only gun in this attack used by a good guy to stop the terrorist who chose to drive a truck through  innocent festival attendees? 

  3. Maybe, Mr Bergh had people during the 1930s in Europe taking a knee, Or maybe his people were camp guards in the 1930s Europe or like George Soros turning and stealing from his people in to survive ?

  4. My memory isn't short. When I write off a company or product (like Pepsi),I don't go back again. Bye, bye Levi's!

  5. Just another Democratic party hack, trying too make a name for himself, basically taking your rights away too avoid litigation, fact is all business’s that pedal this garbage should be held accountable for their non protection, when you enter private property a duty for level of protection is implied unless posted in large letters, otherwise sue litigate, problem is not all stores sell just Junk Levi’s made in Asia!

  6. Levi's are not the same jeans they used to be, lighter and wear out faster.  I have worn them since I started buying my own clothes as a kid.  I was looking for another brand and now that they don't want my buisness I will not buy another pair. 

Comments are closed.