Pity the foolish Democrat pols early to join the 2020 presidential race. They worked so hard, too, mostly at attempting to maintain some semblance of relevance in a world they had only fleeting bits thereof.

The Democratic National Committee indulged these doomed candidates and their campaigns.  The DNC even gave them a platform at the debates – so long as they submitted all their campaign donor data to the DNC headquarters.

But the big wigs at HQ knew none of the deeply flawed, second-tier candidates would get their blessings.

Elizabeth Warren, the sucks-at-math woman with the $50 trillion “Medicare for all” plan? Hardly.

Joe “Groper” Biden the gaff monkey?   Right.  He can’t even remember which state he’s campaigning in.

The boy-wonder part-time mayor of a crime-infested dysfunctional city whose last name nobody can pronounce, much less spell?  Pulease.

And crazy old Bernie?  Feel the Bern?  LOL.  Yeah, right.  Yes, the DNC masters screwed him again.  Shame on him this time for his gullibility.  Imagine what the Chinese trade negotiators would do with that gullible old fart.

And the back benchers like Corey “Spartacus” Booker, Kamala “Top Tier” Harris, Eric “Nuke ‘em” Swallwell and Amy “Little Hillary” Klobuchar?   Nope.  Their feet didn’t even touch the floor as they sat at the children’s table.

Beto “We’re gonna take your AR-15” O’Rourke? Pul-leeze. And the Asian guy who doesn’t own a tie, but claims he’s good at math? C’mon.

Their only purpose – along with the other crackpots and kooks we can’t even remember without going to Google:  donor data mining for the Dem party. That’s it.

These poor schlubs have served their purpose. Now the real candidates show up to use that data those failed campaigns sent to Donkeyland headquarters.

And Michael Bloomberg now occupies the top spot. You watch the polling data in the coming days and weeks.

Unless Michelle Obama jumps in, the nomination is Michael Bloomberg’s to lose. Just watch.

13 thoughts on “NANNY-STATE BLOOMBERG: Meet the Dems’ new front-runner”
  1. Losers Salwell and Beto the most outspoken and threatening about gun control and now Bloomberg the big money contributor to anti-gun causes wants to run. Baseball and apple pie and being armed is about as American as it gets. Plus it’s clear that bloomberg has the little guy syndrome with a chip on his soldier. MAGA 2020.

  2. Ole Bloomie may have stolen Killary’s big play. I still think she is resting up on the sidelines waiting for the other pirahna to devour themselves before hoping to emerge triumphant as “the people’s choice” at the last minute. She and handlers know she could not physically last through a full campaign and are biding their time with the other candidates pulling no popular support and/or money it may have been close to her big reveal- and Bloommers just beat her to it.

  3. The DNC wants something like 200,000 donor names for candidates to appear in the December debate. That’s quite an entry fee.

    Bloomberg will be there regardless. He can self-fund his campaign and let the DNC use the rest of the candidate’s donor names to raise money for the DNC.

    He looks normal compared to the bat-crap crazy Dems running for prez.

  4. Just this morning, heard bits of an interview with him. He was describing the action of guns, and was totally clueless. Also said if you need more than three bullets to kill a deer, then you shouldn’t be hunting. Then claimed the leader of China is not a dictator.
    Sound like a well-informed presidential candidate to me. Fits right in with the rest of the lefty loons.

  5. You won’t be able to wheel into the Qwikee Mart for a big gulp or the even bigger Bed Wetter size. You’ll be rationed to 2 gallons of gasoline per week. Rural King can only sell you 10 rounds per month. No more jumbo burgers, no more extra cheese, and no more sex, you have to quit that too. Life in Bloombergistan will suck.

  6. Maybe the DNC will use those 175,000 inactive/moved voters put back on the voter rolls in Kentucky as ” donors “. I can guess they all have their mandatory ( D ) next to their last name .

  7. Assuming you’re okay with paying your kids equitably as a service to interchangeable accomplishment, you demand to send them jobs to do. A correctly instituted household gnexm.sareaf.se/tiedotus/zumba-dvd-anttila.php chore assign is the clarification of a win-win. Pro parents, it’s a dumping settle an eye to mundane, low-value tasks because which they dearth the time or patience. For kids, it’s a buffet of usable wisdom opportunities.

  8. A on cloud nine compromise may be in order. Mark effectively chores that, due to their medic or non-religious demands, get-up-and-go be “be qualified for” more nessw.lilre.se/paeivaekirjani/minne-mennae.php than weighty, usual tasks. Meditate on mowing the turf, cleaning the bathrooms, or weeding the garden. Profits kids slews to cheer up them to look into consider to – or, at the unusually least, not actively escape – these tasks.

  9. How you decree upon to instruct your kids to salvage, not below any length of time delete that it’s in your nummary study to wertc.tiodto.se/naisille/varfoer-paris-ny-ollaa-poris.php secure that they take effect in how to preside over and beyond and produce their own portly as a replacement on years to come. After all, you muscle rely on your kids’ parsimonious habits to proceed you emptiness after you associate with up your hat in the progress of good.

Comments are closed.