Mother Jones: The publication for the far left granola types out there.
This morning, they published the latest missive in their jihad against guns and gun owners. “Disarmedu Ackbar! Disarmedu Ackbar!” they no doubt chanted as they pressed “Publish” in their WordPress control panel.
The title of the piece?
How the NRA Degrades and Objectifies Women
It’s written by wild-eyed Mark Follman, who is to gun civil rights what Governor Wallace and Sheriff “Bull” Connor were to racial civil rights back in the 1960s.
Follman is all atwitter at the NRA’s use of their First Amendment free-speech rights to promote and defend Americans’ Second Amendment rights.
He’s concerned about the NRA’s appeal towards women in America – and understandably so as the NRA’s messages are resonating with millions of American woman – many of them new as well as prospective gun owners. It doesn’t bode well for those like him who advocate for disarmed victimhood status.
He’s widely critical of the NRA calling out Shannon Watts for being anything but a lonely housewife who just spontaneously became involved in the gun control movement. In reality, Shannon “Watts” is really Shannon Troughton and she’s the President and owner of of VoxPop Public Relations, a boutique liberal PR firm.
The climax of Follman’s screed is his criticism of an ad featuring an attractive and strong woman wielding an AR-15. The ad is for Daniel Defense’s line of civilian M-4-style rifles.
As Miguel at Gun Free Zone writes: “Women Who Refuse To Be A Victim scare Pajama Boys.”
I’ll go one further.
Women who are strong, confident and armed with the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to use firearms to defend themselves and their families cause pajama boys to fill their pajama bottoms with smelly brown stuff.
Pajama boys like those at Mother Jones – including Mark Follman – prefer women who eschew weapons – like the one featured in Bloomberg’s recent ad campaign:. You know the type: helpless, dependent upon others and pleading for her life when the going gets tough.
It’s better to possibly be victimized, the pajama boys will say, than to face near certain risk of hurting yourself with a dangerous gun!
Comments are closed.