We published the story earlier this week of some violence-seeking gun control fanatics who were advocating violence against peaceable Americans – merely because they exercised their Constitutional rights.
“So what line has to be crossed in the good old U.S. of A. before we start mowing them down to make our point?” She continues: “Do we have the ATF and BLM agents roll up in armored tanks? Do we use drone strikes?”
Seems the push back from regular folks caused Susie Madrak, the managing editor at Crooks and Liars some consternation. Our guess is some of their advertisers picked up the phone and explained things in that language called dollars to the head honchos there, because little Susie was trying to recast her story in the comments section – amongst 1400 other people making comments.
Susie Madrak says:
June 25, 2014 at 10:21 (Edit)Hey, thanks for completely missing the point, since I’m a lifelong pacifist. What I was actually saying that there aren’t a lot of options to deal with people who defy the legal government — short of those that seem to inevitably lead to all-out violence, as we saw in Ruby Ridge and Waco. If you think I was advocating violence, you’re wrong.
Words have meaning, Susie.
Susie claims to be a pacifist.
Check out the graphic on top of her personal blog page:
She considers herself a machinegun-toting, grenade-throwing guerrilla, huh?
Is there a little projection going on here?
By the way, here’s what she really looks like:
What was it Rush said about “The feminist movement was created to allow ugly women access to the mainstream of society”?
Comments are closed.