If guns are so dangerous, why then do we have a dozen plus armed guards, in addition to U.S. Secret Service agents at the Sidwell Friends School campus, where the Obama children attend school?

(Breitbart.com) – Some interesting news has broken in the wake of the latest push for gun control by President Obama and Senate Democrats: Obama sends his kids to a school where armed guards are used as a matter of fact.

The school, Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, has 11 security officers and is seeking to hire a new police officer as we speak.

In fact, NBC reporter David Gregory excoriated NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for urging the elimination of “gun free” zones, particularly in schools.  Gregory said guns might not prevent a massacre, but he made no mention that his own children are protected by armed guards at the Sidwell Friends school.

(The Weekly Standard) – David Gregory mocked the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for proposing that armed guards be at every school in America. But the NBC host seems to have no problem with armed guards protecting his kids everyday where they attend school in Washington, D.C.

In other words, allowing parents, teachers and administrators to carry guns in schools to protect average Americans is ludicrous, but Gregory spends good money to send his kids to a school with armed security.  Typical for freedom hating gun control advocates… after all, gun control is more about control than it is about guns.

And, if guns are so dangerous to be around our kids, then why would we risk our President’s well-being?  Shouldn’t we make the White House a “gun-free” zone?

Establish a Gun Free Zone around the President; Send Secret Service Home

(Gun Watch Blog) – In a brilliant act of political satire, someone has created a petition to the white house hereto create a gun free zone around the President and Vice President. All guns would be eliminated there, and the Secret Service would not have any.

If it is good enough for our children, It is good enough for the president, the logic goes.


Creative work by Miguel from Gun Free Zone.
Photo originally by the Soros-paid hacks at CSGV.

Could it be that guns aren’t dangerous?

Could it be that guns save life?

The socialists and communists in our society know that guns stop bad people, which is why they demand their families be protected by guns.

The problem is that they also see guns as a way to silence those who disagree with them once they have disarmed them.


9 thoughts on “Make the White House and the Obama childrens’ school gun-free!”
  1. Oh, I think that both sides of this debate agree that guns in the hands of good guys are ok.

    It’s just that one side of the debate thinks the only good guys are the guys they hire.

    By their definition, the rest of us are, in fact, bad guys. We’re bad guys because we want to defend ourselves and our loved ones instead of leaving it to the “professionals”. We’re bad guys because armed citizens always have the option of saying “no”.

    The “one percent” are not the rich; they are, in fact, the elitists who insist on sending their kids to school with hired gun toting guards, while the rest of us are required (mandatory school attendance, don’t you know) to send our kids to gun free zones to be slaughtered at will by psychopaths.

  2. As law-abiding citizens we are expected to navigate the labyrinth of conflicting state laws regarding firearms and we do successfully everyday. Although many of these laws don’t seem to make sense to firearm owners we still respect them and abide by them everyday.

    Firearms are used more often by law-abiding citizens for self-defense than by deranged criminals to commit horrible acts of mass violence. For several examples for the recent use of firearms for defensive purposes not typically reported by the national media please visit: http://www.equalforce.net and forward this address to others to whom this information may be useful. @forceequalizer

  3. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. If armed guards can not be used in all schools, then those guards must come down. Start a petition on the white house petition page.

  4. I agree what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Also I believe that a shooter that kills and is guilty beyond a doubt, then let’s make an example out of these people — BRING THE DEATH PENALTY BACK”. Why should they live in a prison for the rest of their life on my tax money. Don’t tell me that it is cheaper to keep these prisoners in prisons for life than it is execute them. I will always have a gun for my protection. I also believe firmly that “PEOPLE KILL NOT GUNS”.

  5. Didn’t Billy Jeff the Lecher bask in glory over putting 100,000 more cops in action, including schools? Why is it a good idea from a Democrat, and totally ludicrous from the NRA?

  6. Quite disturbing how many conservatives want to see the first children killed. You do realize the reason they have security is because they are the children of a high profile politician making them giant targets. Of course you didn’t and of course you don’t care. The fact that you’d want these kids put in harms way to prove some kind of deluded point is EXACTLY why there is a push for gun control. People who think like you shouldn’t be holding guns, YOU are just as dangerous as Adam Lanza.

Comments are closed.