Robert Farago at The Truth About guns writes an excellent piece about the racism inherent in gun control schemes.  It’s a great piece.

We’re reprinting excerpts here and encourage you to read the whole thing.  It’s just that good.

“A House Democrat is pushing a package of gun reforms that a recent poll indicates are popular among members of the National Rifle Association (NRA),” reports. “Representative Jim Moran (D-Va.) [The guy whose son orchestrated voter fraud in the last election and was recently convicted of simple assault for his role in his girlfriend repeatedly slamming her face into a metal trash can cage at a bar one night.  Medics said it looked as though the girl gave herself a skull fracture and a broken nose.  We couldn’t have little Jim Moran’s son be debarred the use of guns for the rest of his life, now could we?  ~Editor] said the legislation — which comes as a response to last week’s massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. — will highlight what he calls a disconnect between NRA members and the group’s leaders, who are in near-blanket opposition to tougher gun laws.” There’s the latest strategy from the gun control industry: marginalize the NRA, divide American gun owners and conquer. It’s not a bad plan (for them). But where is it coming from? History is our guide…

…Modern gun control laws continue this racist legacy through various tests (e.g., concealed carry applications), taxes and restrictions on firearms ownership. And the vast majority of the cities and states that violate the Second Amendment’s prohibition against laws that infringe upon Americans’ right to keep and bear arms have a high concentration of minority citizens.

You want to see gun control in action? Go to New York City. Los Angeles. Chicago. Boston. Camden. And New Haven, Connecticut

…Make no mistake: there is a direct connection between violent crime and gun ownership, or lack thereof. You can argue against it all you like, but John Lott’s More Guns, Less Crime is the definitive study on the subject. Its findings couldn’t be more clear: crime is lower where guns are more prevalent.

The hidden truth: states without significant firearms ownership have crime rates that are relatively the same as crime rates as those of states with high gun ownership rates—outside urban areas. The people who suffer most from gun control live in the cities. Within minority communities. Away from the white population.

In short, gun control was, is and always will be a racist policy.  It is, in fact, a form of segregation.

The spree killing-related gun control legislation coming down the pike in Connecticut is only possible because of the state’s racist legacy of gun control. While the death of 20 children is horrific beyond imagination, it should be seen in the context of the suffering of Connecticut’s minority communities, who are personally defenseless against the criminals in their midst.

In states which haven’t violated the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, where the government respects the individual’s right to keep and bear arms, assault weapons and “high capacity” magazine bans are politically impossible.

Strangely (or not), the same Southern states whose racism gave birth to gun control are now bastions of gun rights. They’ve moved on. It’s time for northern liberal-minded states to do the same. Until and unless they do so, they are perpetuating racism in its most virulent and dangerous form. And it will continue to haunt them.

One thought on “The Racism and The Geography of Gun Control”
  1. Here!Here! Bravo! Never thought about it that way. I live in the urban area of the country and I can tell you a story about a dead body under my bedroom widnow but I gotta go to sleep.
    Love this site!

Comments are closed.