Mar 26 2009

THREE IN A ROW! HB 48 DEFEATED!

Depends how you count your victories, but I count three for Illinois gunowners in the past three weeks.

First was State Rep. Kenneth Dunkin, D-Daleyville, “tabling” his bill that would have required a million dollars of liability insurance for Illinois gunowners.  He said Illinois FOID card holders had “educated” him.

Second was not just a victory for Illinois, but for the whole country, as the Department of Defense reversed its new policy that once fired brass had to be mutilated before it could be sold.  Another anti-gun bureaucrat has his fingers stepped on by alert gun owners contacting their Reps and Senators.

Third was yesterday, as Illinios HB 48, the centerpiece of the ant-gunners agenda in Illinois, went down to defeat, 55 for and 60 against.  HB 48 would have banned private sales that did not go through an FFL.

Now would be a great time to call your rep and, if they voted against, thank them, and if they voted for, remind them that your will remember that when you vote next time.

JN

Here’s the info you need to do that, from an ISRA aler

PAT YOURSELVES ON THE BACK

CENTERPIECE OF DALEY GUN CONTROL PACKAGE GOES DOWN IN FLAMES


Illinois gun control advocates have been fond of saying that, if they only pass one bill during the 2009 legislative session, they want it to be a ban on private firearm transfers.

Well, the gun-grabbers’ hopes of passing such a bill were dashed late yesterday when the heavily Democratic Illinois House shot down HB 48 by a 60-55 margin.

If passed, HB48 would have required that private handgun transfers would have to go through an FFL. Proponents of the legislation claimed that such a requirement would deter criminal gun runners from selling guns to gangs.

The thinking person knows that criminals, by definition, do not obey laws. The thinking person knows that bills like HB48 serve only to harass law abiding citizens by forcing them to jump through all sorts of hoops in order to exercise the constitutionally protected right to own firearms. Thankfully there are 60 thinking people in the Illinois House.

HERE IS WHAT YOU NEED TO DO:

Take a look at the roll call vote for HB48.  (www.ilga.gov/legislation/votehistory/96/house/09600HB0048_03252009_035000T.pdf)

If your representative has a “N” next to his/her name, call them up and thank them for voting against this horrible bill.

If your representative has a “Y” next to his/her name, call them up and politely tell them that you are disappointed in their vote and that you will keep their vote in mind next election day.

To find your representative’s phone number, go to: www.ilga.gov/house and click on your representative’s name.


Mar 24 2009

RESPONSE TO M.I.A.C. REPORT

GSL Preface:

This Article is being posted because even though it pertains to the state of Missouri in particular, It is relevant to all states including Illinois; as Illinois also maintains a “Fusion Center” and every member of gunssavelife (Or the NRA, ISRA, or any other Pro 2A Organization) is subject to these law enforcement profilings because of our stance on Gun Control, The Ammunition and Accountability Act: Illinois House Bill 4258, Illinois House Bill 4259, Illinois House Bill 4269, Illinois House Bill 4349, Illinois Senate Bill 1095 (Carried Over from 2007), and our support of the United States Constitution. The mechanism for State and Federal government to profile and classify any of us as “violence-prone militia members” is now in place and paving the way for any/all of us to be officially classified as “Enemy Combatants“, or “Domestic Terrorist“, which then allows Federal Authorities to strip us of all our rights, confiscate our guns, property, and personal assets, and imprison us indefinitely and without charge at the nearest FEMA/DHS internment camp. The potential ramifications of this are HUGE! It basically eliminates the 1st Amendment by quelling all political dissent and they no longer need to pass anti-gun legislation in order to confiscate your guns. They simply need to propose it and get you to object to it in order to classify you as a “potentially dangerous militia member” and sidestep the Constitution altogether via these onerous and draconian Laws, Executive Orders, and Government Agencies. This is an incredibly serious matter and we urge you to research and verify this information on your own as much as you can and to contact your State and Federal Representatives and let your objections be heard as strongly and as frequently as possible.

You can download the entire M.I.A.C. Report here.

MY RESPONSE TO M.I.A.C. REPORT

By Chuck Baldwin
March 24, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

By now, readers should be familiar with the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) report dated 02/20/09 and titled, “MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement.” In this dreadfully malicious and slanderous “law enforcement sensitive” secret police report, Governor Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon; John Britt, Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety; James Keathley, Colonel, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Van Godsey, Director of MIAC categorize certain citizens as being potential violence-prone “militia members.” I would venture to guess that more than 75% of the entire population of the United States would fit the MIAC’s broad definition of someone who would fall into the aforementioned category.

According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you could qualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous “militia member”:

The United Nations
The New World Order
Gun Control
The violation of Posse Comitatus
The Federal Reserve
The Income Tax
The Ammunition and Accountability Act
A possible Constitutional Convention
The North American Union
Universal Service Program
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
Abortion
Illegal Immigration

Again, I would bet that at least 75% of the American people would oppose at least one or more items on the above list. Well, according to the MIAC report, that is sufficient to make them potential dangerous “militia members.”

However, it is the following statement contained in the MIAC report that is particularly disturbing to yours truly. Under the heading “Political Paraphernalia,” the report states, “Militia members most commonly associate with 3rd party political groups. It is not uncommon for militia members to display Constitutional [sic] Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarian material. These members are usually supporters of former Presidential Candidate [sic]: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr.”

The obvious inference of the above statement links Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and myself to potential dangerous “militia members.” The broader implication is that the millions of people who supported Ron Paul, Bob Barr, or myself are likewise categorized as potential dangerous “militia members.” This is a classic case of broad-brushed police profiling. Can you imagine the fallout of this preposterous report had the names Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Maxine Waters been used instead of the names Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr?

Accordingly, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and I wrote a formal letter to the above-named Missouri officials demanding “that the following-described document be immediately removed from any and all websites associated with or maintained by the state of Missouri or any agency thereof, including the MIAC; that the said document no longer be circulated by the state of Missouri or any agency thereof or associated therewith; and that the state of Missouri repudiate its references to the three of us contained therein.”

To view the full text of our letter to Governor Nixon of Missouri, click here.

Ladies and gentlemen, we simply cannot allow this kind of police profiling to continue. I assure you, this phenomenon is not limited to the State of Missouri. Every state that has a “Fusion Center” is being fed this kind of nonsense on a regular basis. You and I are commonly referred to as “extremists” in these secret police reports. This has been happening in earnest for the past couple of months and is operating under the auspices of the federal Department of Homeland Security. And people with a public platform (such as myself, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and a host of others) are now being singled out by name. How long will it be before police agencies begin “picking up and hauling away” those people whose names are mentioned in these reports? It may be sooner than we think.

To see if your state has a “Fusion Center,” click here. (Illinois does and is on the list)

The only thing that will stymie this nonsense is a huge public outcry opposing it. Yes, the people of this country (that means YOU) still have the power to put a stop to this kind of totalitarian thinking. If we do nothing, however, it will soon be too late to stop it. We either stop it now, or it will quickly mushroom into a leviathan that will both monitor and control the personal opinions and speech of every man, woman, and child in this country. No, I am not exaggerating.

The Feds already monitor virtually every phone call, email, and public speech in the country. How long before these secret police reports will be used as justification to arrest and incarcerate people because of their ideas and opinions, labeling them as a “threat” or as “dangerous” to society?

Here is the contact information for the appropriate officials in Missouri:

Email address: Brandon.middleton@mshp.dps.mo.gov

Missouri Information Analysis Center
Division of Drugs & Crime Control
P. O. Box 568
Jefferson City, MO 65102-0568
Phone: 573-751-6422
Toll Free: 866-362-6422
Fax: 573-751-9950

And while you are at it, you should also contact the state police agency as well as the governor’s office in your state, especially if your state has a “Fusion Center” (see web site above). Mark it down: if you have ever publicly opposed any of the above-mentioned issues or organizations, or have ever publicly supported an independent Presidential candidate, YOU ARE BEING PROFILED RIGHT NOW!

We await the State of Missouri’s response. In the meantime, what are you going to do?

P.S. Even as this column is being distributed, we have just received a reply from the Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety, John Britt. I will analyze and respond to this statement in my next column.

© 2009 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin500.htm


Mar 24 2009

We The People Stimulus Package


Mar 24 2009

The Second American Revolution


Mar 17 2009

“Burma Shave” style signs

We haven’t mentioned our Burma Shave style signs in a while.  Here’s a blog post I found from someone who likes them: 

http://crazedpw.blogspot.com/2008/08/gunssavelifecom.html

We’ve got similar signs on I-55.  Every Chicago lawmaker (except those who fly at our expense) passes them every time they come down to Springfield.  That’s one way to communicate with them. 

JN


Mar 16 2009

NRA News - IGOLD 2009 - Part 1 of 2


Mar 16 2009

NRA News - IGOLD 2009 - Part 2 of 2


Mar 12 2009

Photos from IGOLD!


Mar 9 2009

Anti-gun committees in the morning, IGOLD in the afternoon…

NRA lobbyist Todd Vandermyde has posted another Capitol Commentary at isra.org.  It reads in part,

“We have received late word that there are a host of anti-gun bills scheduled for Committee on Wednesday morning, from semi-auto bans to one gun per month to mandatory registration of your firearms. Most of the committees will take place in the morning, before the start of IGOLD. Some of them are assigned to committees designed to ensure their passage to the floor. Others may not be so friendly.

Either way IGOLD becomes even more important and timely. If any of these bills do pass out of committee, then your presence at the capitol will be even more important as a way of rapidly telling your state representatives and senators that our rights are not for sale or subjected to the whims of gun hating Chicago elitists who think you and your family should be subjected to the wishes of crack addicts and bureaucrats.”

If you were planning on driving down anyway, maybe go down early and sit in on some of those committees… If your blood pressure is under control, that is.  We don’t want you to have a heart attack listening to the drivel coming from the Chicago-area gun haters. 

But we DO want you at IGOLD.  Wouldn’t it be interesting to meet a legislator who voted against us in the morning, shake his hand, and ask him why.  Y0u could ask him if he or she thinks that YOU are a bad guy who needs his rights curtailed. 

See you in Springfield!


Mar 8 2009

In the Champaign-Urbana News Gazette, Letters to the Editor

Board should vote on gun resolution

Sunday March 8, 2009

For two years, while 87 other counties in Illinois have passed a Second Amendment Resolution supporting the Second Amendment rights of law-aiding citizens in Illinois, the Champaign County Board has insisted that it isn’t a county matter.

For whatever its reasons, it has chosen to align itself with Cook County.

On Feb. 3, the Illinois Sheriffs’ Association passed a resolution supporting the right of the law-abiding citizens of Illinois to carry a firearm for self defense. If a license to carry bill, as supported by the ISA, were to be passed by the Illinois General Assembly, Illinois would finally join 48 other states that already have license-to-carry laws.

I believe that county sheriffs represent the citizens within their counties.

The question is, does the Champaign County Board?

Champaign County can align itself with its citizens’ natural rights, or it can continue to claim that it isn’t a county matter.

GENE MARTIN

Champaign

Good Letter, Gene.  Now, where are the rest of you?  I see a letter to the Editor from Gene Martin in the News-Gazette at least once a month. 

Of the 2000 or so folks that read this blog, how many are from Champaign County?  Of that number, how many have written to the News-Gazette (the paper of record for that county)?

Come on, folks.  Many hands make light work.  Let’s get those keyboards humming…